If you try to tell me we don’t need feminism you are an idiot
*conveniently ignores the sexualize of men*
*desperately clings to victim complex*
Weird. I google image searched girls and got a bunch of kid to preteen girls doing girly stuff like crafting and hanging out. Then I googled “sexy women” and got he very same type of images you got.
Feminists lying to push their agenda? Nooo, never!!
Could you get a screen cap of that? If you did you could really destroy the credibility of OP and give your blog a lot of publicity at the same time.
Oh, absolutely. I don’t care really about publicity, but I do care about showing proof if asked.
I googled “boy” (proof is the tab name, that’s why it’s circled)
Huh. A bunch of young boys. Cute. okay, Now “girl”
A bunch of innocent girls. How about “man” and “woman”?
Nothing wrong there.Hmm.. How about “sexy woman”
Those look like the same kind of images OP is getting. HOW ODD.
Proof is not only in the images, but the tab names.
Another feminist who lies for attention (and no one is surprised).
I think there’s some misinformation.
You googled “girl” they googled “girls”. Of course, google searches are highly dependant on type of content you go through, but here’s what I got when I typed in “girls”
But we also have to consider what we’re typing is also a term used for a very wide age range, where you have popular girl bands like “mocha girls” and “girls’ generation”, you’ve got spring breakers being called ”Selena Gomez and the bad girls”.
Girls is much more commonly used for young woman more so than young woman.
It’s like when I type in guy, this happens:
Guy can refer to any age range, but we use it mostly for young man and surprise surprise…. you’ve got sexy pics! That’s because of the popularisation of the term guy for young men, just like girl is popularised as a term for a young woman.
So there’s that.
Basically, google takes the words used in the picture descriptions and gives results based on that. Which is why this “google search” shit shouldn’t be used to prove anything.